The first ITC meeting was in September, and focused largely on just orientating new members to the committee. As part of the process, each member was asked to give a list of “pet projects” they’d like to see the committee or campus take up. The full list is in our minutes, which are online here: http://itc.wisc.edu/minutes/minutes.asp?min_id=522
One thing I am very interested in pushing this year is lecture capture, i.e. recording audio and video of lectures and posting it online. I think it is a terrible waste that so few lectures are recorded on this campus – to use a bad analogy, they’re like an inefficient power plant, and capturing these lectures could produce a lot more value for students, faculty, and the public. I think an ambitious but attainable goal would have 100% of lectures captured in five years.
In a related issue from the first meeting, a member of the committee mentioned “clickers”, which are the devices that a professor can use to have students vote or answer questions during lectures. Clickers are unpopular with students, right? Please let me know if I’m way off base here.
Another issue that we’ve spent a lot of time discussing on the ITC is Moodle, which is a software package that does the same thing as the software behind Learn@UW. If you’re in the business school or college of engineering, you’ve probably used Moodle. I will write more about Moodle in the future, but campus and the ITC is paying careful attention to Moodle as a potential replacement for the current Learn@UW. It’s unlikely to happen anytime soon, and certainly not until next fall, which would only happen in the very worst-case scenario.
The ITC website is http://itc.wisc.edu/, and our meetings are the 3rd Friday of every month at 10am. We have many visitors who attend the meetings, and any interested student should absolutely attend – the chair is very good about allowing guests to participate in the discussion!
4 comments:
To help confirm your beliefs, clickers are unpopular as far as I know.
I agree in the dislike of clickers. They're another money drain on students and a sad way for professors to keep track of who actually comes to lecture. Hand raising works just as well for answering questions. I have a physics professor who uses colored pieces of paper, too (Red for A, Green for B, etc.) so that we don't have to buy clickers.
Just to play devil's advocate, a positive of clickers is that they're relatively anonymous, so you can answer without fear of everyone else in the class seeing if you've got the wrong answer.
I think capturing lecture is a good idea and could go along with the Wisconsin Idea. However, I wonder if the access to the lecture will be limited (to students, pay-per-view, etc). I also have concerns about student privacy, what if you are caught on camera or audio and you don't want to be?
Post a Comment