University Academic Planning Council recaps

The UAPC meets monthly, but thus far this year we’ve canceled as many meetings as we’ve had. The September meeting was canceled, so our first meeting was October. November was canceled, we met briefly in December, and January was canceled again. February was our first real meeting in a long time.

I’ll recap the December meeting quickly, which won't be hard because it was very short. It was the Thursday of finals week, and the big blizzard was right on our doorstep, so we were probably ready to move quick and get out of there. The item that’s of most interest to students was authorizing the implementation of a new BS in Personal Finance. We’ve always had a personal finance curriculum, as a track in the Consumer Science major. The current option covers all of the courses necessary for a graduate to obtain Certified Financial Planner status from the Fin. Planning professional society. The new major uses the same curriculum, but as an actual major will be easier for students to find, and be easier to explain to potential employers.

We closed the meeting with a commendation for Pat Farrell, as this was his last meeting as Provost and chair of the committee. We adopted the following: “The members of the UAPC greatly appreciate the leadership and dedication provided by Provost Patrick Farrell during his 2.5 years as Provost of the University of Wisconsin –Madison. Under Provost Farrell, the University of Wisconsin continued to excel as a world-class university, and Provost Farrell brought both integrity and vision to our University.”

We next met in February, with Julie Underwood, dean of the School of Education and now interim Provost as chair. Her meeting pace was a little quicker than we’ve been used to, but she’s very funny to match it and I have no doubt she’ll be a good chair for however long her tenure as interim provost runs.

We approved two items that of note to students. First, we agreed to a request to rename the Department of Rural Sociology to Community and Environmental Sociology. The name Rural Sociology didn’t cover much of what the department did, and the current students in the department are enthusiastic about the name change. The UW is one of just two universities to still use the name Rural Sociology. The department believes that the new name will help them attract more students to their program. (The Faculty Senate still has to sign off on the name change)

We also approved a new Certificate in German. Surprisingly, we don’t have many certificates in languages. With all of the emphasis in internationalization, language study is an important complimentary component to other majors, but short of getting a second major in the language, there are few options for getting recognition of those efforts. The hope is that by offering a certificate in German, we can help students who want to take more German than what was required to get retro-credits for high school German work, but don’t have the time or desire to get a full German major. This may take some pressure off the German major, because some students can opt for just the certificate. Other language departments will be watching to see how this works, and could potentially start to offer their own certificates.

One of the lessons I’ve learned is that we are not a speedy committee, and in February we took up a discussion of the makeup of the committee, which was an idea from October. We don’t have final approval over our makeup, but we have recommended to the University Committee (which is the executive committee of the Faculty Senate) that they amend our charter to make the student member a voting member of the committee. The UC may make a recommendation to the Faculty Senate, who may or may not take it up, but I’m hopeful and think that future student appointees will have a vote. I will obviously keep following this.

Finally, we discussed potential agenda items for upcoming meetings. At our March meeting, we’ll be discussing clinical/professional PhDs, and the distinctions between these degrees and the more traditional research PhDs. I’m also concerned about time-to-degree for PhD students, but we may not have the right data for that discussion until next year when the Council of Graduate Schools study finishes up. I want to keep on this, because I think we can make progress before we need that data. I also hope that we will be discussing transfer credit agreements and the processes involved in approving those yet this year.

In the past week or so, there has been a fair amount of news coverage about multiple majors and the implications they have on the University. This is something that is within the scope of the UAPC to discuss. It is not on our agenda for March, but I will get a sense if this is a discussion that is coming for a future meeting. Look for a post about multiple majors, hopefully near the end of spring break.

University Academic Planning Council October 08 Meeting

The first meeting of the University Academic Planning Council (UAPC) was on Thursday October 16th. The UAPC is one of the last bodies that reviews academic programs and long-range plans before final approval by the Provost, Chancellor, and Faculty Senate. The UAPC is chaired by the Provost, and has as voting members the Dean of the Graduate School, an administrator chosen by the Provost (current the Dean of L&S), a representative from the University Committee (the executive committee of the Faculty Senate), 5 more faculty members, a representative from the Academic Staff Executive Committee, and a non-voting student representative. The Chancellor is officially a member, but by tradition does not attend the meetings.

In a nutshell, if you don’t want to read all what we do in Faculty Policy and Procedures (FP&P), we approve the creation, modification, and elimination of certificates, majors, centers, and departments, as well as reviewing campus wide academic issues.

As this was our first meeting, we spent some time reviewing the charge of the committee and our processes. Five minutes into the meeting, when we were just reviewing the roster of the committee, a member wondered aloud why the student member was non-voting, and quickly we decided to add to the agenda for our next meeting a recommendation to the University Committee to consider changing FP&P to give voting rights to the student member. I don’t know how long this process will take (our next meeting to even make the recommendation isn’t until the end of December), so I am not expecting to have an official vote this year. However, there’s a good chance that future student members will have voting membership on the council.

When we actually got down to business, our main item was reviewing the annual report of the University General Education committee. The Gen Ed committee oversees things like the CommA/CommB and Qualitative Reasoning A and B requirements, along with the UAPC. This past year the Gen Ed committee studied in-depth the Comm A courses and what sort of effects they had on students. In summary, students who take Comm A courses benefit from the experience, no matter which of the five different Comm A courses they take.

We also approved a new certificate program in the Engineering Physics department in “Engineering Risk, Uncertainty, and Decision Analysis”. This is for undergraduates, and packages together existing courses in Engineering and Statistics, as well as a new Engineering course, to produce a 15-credit program.

Our website is at http://apa.wisc.edu/acad_plng.html - the annual report from the 07-08 academic year is a fast read and gives a good feel for what we do.